The American political landscape today bears a striking resemblance to the turbulence of Richard Nixon’s second term: internal fractures within the Grand Old Party, emerging political scandals, economic anxiety, and the looming threat of losing control of Congress. This parallel places President Donald Trump squarely in the eye of a perfect storm—one that could jeopardize his second term.
|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
The American political landscape today bears a striking resemblance to the turbulence of Richard Nixon’s second term: internal fractures within the Grand Old Party, emerging political scandals, economic anxiety, and the looming threat of losing control of Congress. This parallel places President Donald Trump squarely in the eye of a perfect storm: one that could jeopardize his second term.
The threats encircling Trump are not confined to Democratic opposition; they are simmering within his own Republican base, unsettling the markets, and prompting U.S. allies abroad to reassess their strategic footing in light of what they view as an impulsive, isolated administration driven by an appetite for executive dominance.
From the Epstein scandal and market volatility to fraying alliances and the specter of electoral defeat, Trump’s crises are mounting and increasingly entangled. Together, they amount to a profound test of his authority, the legitimacy of his presidency, and his continued viability as a consequential actor on both the domestic and international stage.
From the Epstein scandal and market volatility to fraying alliances and the specter of electoral defeat, Trump’s crises are mounting and increasingly entangled. Together, they amount to a profound test of his authority, the legitimacy of his presidency
A perfect storm of scandal, political blunders, and global missteps is eroding President Trump’s iron-clad grip on power and threatening his legacy. On the surface, the signs of the electoral tempest appear to be isolated squalls that capture headlines with the regularity of weather updates. But dig in a bit and they expose deeper rifts that threaten his control of the ship of state. Scandal, political polarization, global mistrust, economic threats, and power struggles collectively threaten to uproot his party’s control of Congress and America’s stature on the world stage.
The scandal contains many titillating accusations, a prostitution ring of girls as young as 14, powerful business and political customers, conspiracy theories running amok, an elusive client list, even extortion schemes plotted by Israeli intelligence agents. Numerous news reports and investigations tie Trump to Epstein’s circle of friends and luminaries who exploited the women. But Trump’s involvement is not the problem. He has weathered numerous similar scandals. The challenge the Epstein files pose for Trump is how he and his Attorney General Pam Bondi reneged on a promise to make the files public.
The failure to deliver infuriated Trump’s Make America Great Again or MAGA supporters, who think the release of files will wound Democrats more deeply. Speculation about the contents of the files frequently mentions former President Bill Clinton. A decision on making them public now rests with several federal judges; only they have the authority to release grand jury records mandated secret by federal law. Even if the judges decide to lift the veil of secrecy, the process could take months, leaving Trump’s right wing allies fuming.
The gathering storm on his right wing comes at a time fraught with peril for Trump and the Republicans. American voters will head to the polls in about fifteen months for mid-term elections for congressmen and women whose terms will expire.
Historically, the mid-terms serve as a referendum on the policies of an incumbent president. Incumbent presidents usually do not do well. On average, the party in power loses 37 seats in the House when the President’s approval rating is less than 50 percent. Trump’s current approval rating is at 41 percent, the lowest of any president since Dwight Eisenhower. And Republicans control the House of Representatives by a slim 220 to 213 majority. They dominate the Senate by five seats. To seize control of the House, a crucial component of Trump’s power, Democrats need to flip only seven seats. Trump can’t afford such a loss. Yet his leadership style and his missteps make Republican loss of House control likely.
Trump can’t afford such a loss. Yet his leadership style and his missteps make Republican loss of House control likely
Public disapproval of his polices intensify the challenge facing the President. Numerous credible polls and investigations show that the public disapproves of Trump’s policies: 59 percent do not like his tariffs; 55 percent are unhappy with the budget cuts that caused widespread layoffs and firings; 51 percent think he is making too many unilateral decisions with executive orders and inflation may not be as tamed as it seems nearly 200 days into his administration.
The apparent fight with the Fed chair is not Trump’s only money problem. By pushing hard for his “Big Beautiful” tax bill, Trump significantly added to the public debt, alienating the anti-debt wing of his party, which now includes Elon Musk. The tech whiz billionaire donated nearly $300 million to Republicans in 2024, according to federal records.
Indeed, even though the official inflation rate is at 2.7 percent, a recent Chicago Sun-Times investigation revealed that grocery price inflation, a key element of consumer prices that angers voters, continues to soar. The newspaper created a shopping cart of 35 key items at four major Chicago food stores. “With Trump marking six months in office,” the newspaper reported, “we dove into the data and found the total price of our shipping cart was up as much as $11. Most of the products we tracked stayed at their already highs or got more expensive.”
The price trend gives Jerome Powell, the chair of the Federal Reserve Board, a deeper incentive to fight inflation with higher interest rates. But Trump wants Powell’s Fed to lower them, threatening to fire him, a warning that gives many business-side backers of the President the jitters. They view a Fed insulated from politics as a foundation of a credible banking system and a stable U.S. dollar.
Angry at Trump, Musk hit back by forming a third political party, the “America Party,” which he set up to strategically target significant congressional races where voters feel underrepresented by Democrats and Republicans. Third parties usually do not win in American politics, but they can inflict damage on other candidates, particularly one like Trump, whose tactics also expose the weaknesses of his “America First” foreign policy.
When Trump took office on January 20, 2025, he decided to rule more like a czar than a traditional president would with a Congress, which is supposed to function as a check and balance on the White House, at his disposition. So far, Trump has issued 174 executive orders implementing sweeping policies with the stroke of a pen. Many targets of his executive orders are domestic, notably immigration and diversity policies. However, by capitalizing on his powers as the leader of the most powerful nation on earth, Trump created concerns over a raft of international issues.
Executive orders are a fast-track approach to get thing done, but they can easily be replaced later by another President of a different persuasion, creating uncertainty, a climate that international political and business leaders detest.
Even absent the President’s unpredictability, Trump struggles on the international stage. U.S. allies and enemies alike loathe his punitive tariffs and will strike back if he does not offset them with his proverbial deals. The tariffs will soon start to strike with higher prices across the board. He is not doing well on non-tariff issues, either.
Russia’s Vladimir Putin humiliated the US president when he rejected Trump’s peace overtures that he bragged he would achieve in Ukraine immediately. Putin made Trump look weak. He told America voters he wanted to take on China. Yet China is busy capitalizing on Trumps global missteps by offering to fill gaps created by Trump’s erratic policies.
When Trump, for instance, took executive actions that crippled American’s USAID program designed to help impoverished populations, China quickly increased its foreign aid to compensate for USAID’s retreat. China also offers potential U.S. allies across the world access to its Belt and Road infrastructure Initiatives as a reliable substitute for an erratic America.
In the Middle East, America’s pro-Israel policies garner some support. Nevertheless, they also sow even deeper division among radical factions rather than address the generational and racial animosities that have divided the region for decades. Other former allies now seek new alliances that make them less vulnerable to the whims of the United States. NATO and European allies, for example, are forming tighter regional pacts to maintain existing agreements that the United States rejects, such as the Paris climate accord or the Iran nuclear deal. Trump’s international approach is not winning him any friends at home, either.
Other former allies now seek new alliances that make them less vulnerable to the whims of the United States.
Trump’s go for it alone policies and his tariffs garner disapproval rates among U.S. voters. Numerous polls report that Americans disapprove of Trump’s approach to the war in Ukraine at rates of 47 to 59 percent. Nearly 60 percent told CNN that they don’t think Trump’s policies will lead to long-term peace.
In a perfect world, Congress should serve as a check on a U.S. president’s power on the domestic and foreign stage. But the current Congress, dominated by MAGA wing of the Republican party, is spineless. Lawmakers tolerate Trump’s “America First” foreign policy and cheer his unruly domestic political missteps. MAGA Republicans stood by silently as Trump voiced hostility to NATO and pushed tariffs that are unpopular with voters. Indeed, Trump’s domestic and international policies may pose a far greater threat to his presidency and legacy than his political opponents.
Larry Sabato, a prominent political analyst and expert on U.S. politics, gives Democrats a strong chance to take back the House. He says a net loss of just seven seats in the House will cost the President’s party control of the chamber. President Trump is worried. The Texas Tribune reports that he told Gregg Abbot, the Texas governor and Trump acolyte, to advance the date of the state’s redistricting by five years to create additional Republican seats in advance of the mid-term elections. Abbot complied.
In just about fifteen months, though, many of his loyalists will face the ultimate test: an election. When congressmen and women face the possibility they could lose their jobs, they just might give America what it needs: a Congress with a spine.
In just about fifteen months, though, many of his loyalists will face the ultimate test: an election. When congressmen and women face the possibility they could lose their jobs, they just might give America what it needs: a Congress with a spine.
Ultimately, the threats facing Trump’s second term do not emanate from his Democratic rivals but from deep structural cracks eating up the roots of his electoral base, the GOP, and economic institutions that are wary of his approaches. His foreign policies, which have exhausted allies and upset the balance of power, further exacerbate the threats. Ironically, the very populist tools that propelled him to power now seem to be morphing into an existential threat to his presidency. What is unfolding cannot be ascribed to the rivalry with the other political party but is seen as an inevitable clash with the system he himself created.
Keep in touch with our news & offers
